Sunday, May 19, 2013

Theoretical Approaches to Punishment




Theoretical Approaches to Punishment

I believe in punishment for those that break the law.  But, the ethical dilemma is the law fair and just to everyone.  While serving as a sheriff deputy I have seen those who were charged with a crime that could afford attorney receive less time behind bars then those with court appointed public defenders.  This is because public defenders lack the experience and resources of a paid attorney.  Their clients who are usually poor do not receive the appropriate representation which contributes to longer jail or prison term.   Once incarcerated these newly convict criminal are exposed to the worst society has to offer.  In most cases either they become victimized by these individual or skilled in the art of criminalization.(Banks, 2013)

Secondly punishment does not always stop individual from committing further crimes.  In a Pew Center study on national recidivism reports that 4 out of 10 offender’s returns to prison 3 years after being released this statistic remains unchanged over several years.  Even after many states launched programs to help those re-enter society it still has no effect on the recidivism rate.  The Pew’s Public Safety Performance Project study analyzed 41 states where inmates were released from prison in 1999 through 2007 results found by 2002 over 45% of these inmates returned to prison and by 2007 over 43% returned. (Johnson, 2011) 

Finally the results of punishment through lengthy prison sentences does serve as a deterrent for those who are contemplating breaking the law.  The news media plays a major role in publicizing result of trials in newspapers, magazines, and internet webpages and gives various techniques used by law enforcement how crimes are investigated and solved.   This also deters members of society to commit crime because of the fear of getting caught.(Banks, 2013) 

Banks, C. (2013). Criminal justice ethics. (3rd ed., pp. 115-116). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE

Johnson, K. (2011, April 13). Prison failing to deter repeat criminals in 41 states. USATODAY. Retrieved from: http:// usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/nation/2011-04-12-Prison-recidivism-rates-hold-steady.htm//

2 comments:

  1. Joel I don't believe that the high number of prisoners reentering the penal system is totally their responsibility. When a person spends his/her time as a ward of the state. I think the state should equip people who are being released back into society. The sad truth is: states depend on the prisoner reentering. The government pays farmers not to farm but will build a prison on the farmers land. Now when grandma comes to visit her grand son on Saturday night in rual Albany,Indiana. "She has no place to stay," until the new development of the Holiday Inn express, the restauraunts, etc. Now that once small farm community is now benefiting from the repeat/offender. Its a big business and only a few are capitalizing. That to me is unethical.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Joel: You have written a thought-provoking blog. You have raised a lot of questions that we, as a society, need to address. What solutions would you suggest to resolve the inequalities and problems addressed in your blog?

    ReplyDelete